🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has stated it is claiming damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic stability.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Wider Implications

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious attack on property rights and the global financial system created by the United States."

The clearing house declined to comment on the latest legal action. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are working on steps to deter other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would only be required to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to fund a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a clear signal that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."