🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.